<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Potential Microsoft/Yahoo Marriage on Your Small Business Owner Radar?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinebusiness.volusion.com/articles/is-the-microsoftyahoo-marriage-on-your-small-business-owner-radar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinebusiness.volusion.com/articles/is-the-microsoftyahoo-marriage-on-your-small-business-owner-radar/</link>
	<description>Insights for entrepreneurs and online business owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 11:19:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: blogadmin</title>
		<link>/articles/is-the-microsoftyahoo-marriage-on-your-small-business-owner-radar/#comment-1659</link>
		<dc:creator>blogadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinebusiness.volusion.com/articles/is-the-microsoftyahoo-marriage-on-your-small-business-owner-radar/#comment-1659</guid>
		<description>Since MSN&#039;s algorithm lags behind that of Google&#039;s, tricks like cloaking, keyword spamming, etc. tended to work better with MSN&#039;s search engine.  They haven&#039;t even made an official stance on paid links, which Google specifically punished in October of 2006.  MSN&#039;s number of indexable pages is also lower, and I&#039;ve heard it weighs the age of a page less than Google&#039;s algorithm does.  This would make it easier to spam a site to the top much faster.

Windows Live is a different product and is similar to Google.  If any sort of merger goes through, it&#039;s not certain what Microsoft would do with this product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since MSN&#8217;s algorithm lags behind that of Google&#8217;s, tricks like cloaking, keyword spamming, etc. tended to work better with MSN&#8217;s search engine.  They haven&#8217;t even made an official stance on paid links, which Google specifically punished in October of 2006.  MSN&#8217;s number of indexable pages is also lower, and I&#8217;ve heard it weighs the age of a page less than Google&#8217;s algorithm does.  This would make it easier to spam a site to the top much faster.</p>
<p>Windows Live is a different product and is similar to Google.  If any sort of merger goes through, it&#8217;s not certain what Microsoft would do with this product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>/articles/is-the-microsoftyahoo-marriage-on-your-small-business-owner-radar/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinebusiness.volusion.com/articles/is-the-microsoftyahoo-marriage-on-your-small-business-owner-radar/#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>MSN is a &quot;backyard for SEO spammers&quot;? You can buy your way into the SERPs on Yahoo using their submission service. Take an overview of any industry, and you&#039;ll find that MSN search results are really similar to that of Google, while Yahoo&#039;s are entirely distinct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSN is a &#8220;backyard for SEO spammers&#8221;? You can buy your way into the SERPs on Yahoo using their submission service. Take an overview of any industry, and you&#8217;ll find that MSN search results are really similar to that of Google, while Yahoo&#8217;s are entirely distinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

